Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 1
Judge Rejects Lindsay Clancy Bid for Acquittal After 11-1 Mistrial
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 1

Judge Rejects Lindsay Clancy Bid for Acquittal After 11-1 Mistrial

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Oct 1

Summary

  • Judge William Sullivan ruled that a rational juror could have found Lindsay Clancy, 36, guilty of killing her three children, denying her post-mistrial request for a not-guilty finding.
  • Tuesday's hearing marked a shift by defense lawyer Kevin Reddington, who argued prosecutors had not proved Clancy killed the children or was criminally responsible after previously relying on an insanity defense at trial.
  • Prosecutors said the evidence was sufficient to convict Clancy in the January 2023 deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months; authorities say she strangled them with exercise bands before attempting suicide.
  • A Nov. 2 hearing will address whether Clancy is retried, along with defense motions to dismiss the case and investigate the lone juror who voted to convict in the 11-1 deadlock.

Insights

With an 11-1 jury split favoring insanity, what hidden evidence convinced the judge to deny Lindsay Clancy’s bid for a not guilty finding?
Could a lone holdout juror and a looming double jeopardy motion completely derail the retrial of a paralyzed mother accused of murder?
How does the justice system measure sanity when experts completely disagree on whether severe postpartum psychosis drove a mother to murder?