Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Aug 25
Louisiana Justice Hughes Wins $300,000 From The Advocate in Defamation Verdict
Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Aug 25

Louisiana Justice Hughes Wins $300,000 From The Advocate in Defamation Verdict

1 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Aug 25

Summary

  • $300,000 was awarded to Louisiana Supreme Court Justice Jefferson Davis Hughes III after an Iberville Parish jury found a 2019 Advocate editorial defamed him, reaching its verdict after 45 minutes.
  • Jurors concluded Hughes met the high bar for a public official by proving actual malice, after the trial judge had ruled the paper could be found to have acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
  • The case centered on an editorial saying Hughes was romantically involved with lawyer Berkley Durbin while she represented a party in a 1998-99 custody fight; the paper later took years to clarify the timeline online.
  • The award fell far short of the $10 million Hughes sought, with the jury foreman saying the panel was initially split on defamation but agreed his damages were much lower.
  • The verdict followed an Alabama jury's $9.25 million award against the New York Times on Friday, marking a second straight business day of US juries imposing defamation damages on major publications.

Insights

How did a delayed correction turn a decades-old romance into a $300,000 defamation victory for a sitting Supreme Court Justice?
Could a $300,000 payout over a 1999 custody dispute spark a nationwide shift in how public figures sue the press?
Will this rare jury verdict against a major newspaper redefine how the media investigates the private lives of powerful public officials?