Updated
Updated · Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr · Aug 24
Labour Court Reinstates 2 Workers, Rejecting 'Completion of Tasks' Fixed-Term Contracts
Updated
Updated · Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr · Aug 24

Labour Court Reinstates 2 Workers, Rejecting 'Completion of Tasks' Fixed-Term Contracts

1 articles · Updated · Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr · Aug 24

Summary

  • Two workers placed through a temporary employment service were ruled permanent employees by December 2018 and must be reinstated with full retrospective effect to Jan. 2, 2019.
  • The Labour Court said their contracts failed section 198B because they recorded no end date and used the vague phrase “completion of tasks,” which it held is not a valid written reason for fixing a term.
  • That defect meant the employer could not rely on seasonal demand swings, rolling contracts or call-back practices to justify keeping low-paid staff on fixed terms beyond 3 months.
  • The court set aside a 2022 arbitration award that had treated the contracts as expired, finding the workers were unfairly dismissed when they were not called back after the annual shutdown.
  • The ruling reinforces that ordinary business risk cannot be shifted to below-threshold workers and that deemed-employee status can be decided within an unfair-dismissal case.

Insights

Are thousands of supposedly temporary workers actually permanent employees hiding in plain sight due to this landmark ruling?
Can a vague contract phrase accidentally turn your temporary seasonal workers into permanent employees overnight?
Will closing the temporary employment loophole force seasonal manufacturers to replace low-paid workers with automation?