Updated
Updated · macfarlanes.com · Jul 29
UK Courts Narrow Post-Termination Curbs as Data Act 2025 Adds Employer Complaint Duty
Updated
Updated · macfarlanes.com · Jul 29

UK Courts Narrow Post-Termination Curbs as Data Act 2025 Adds Employer Complaint Duty

2 articles · Updated · macfarlanes.com · Jul 29

Summary

  • Three recent UK rulings signaled tighter scrutiny of post-termination restrictions, with courts blocking a group company’s enforcement claim, striking down a training clawback and rejecting a 6-month non-compete.
  • In the training case, the Court of Appeal held an £8,000 repayment demand on an employee earning about £18,000 was an unreasonable restraint of trade because it acted as a punitive disincentive to leave.
  • A separate ruling found group companies could not enforce restrictions against a financial adviser deemed a "worker," and unclear drafting also defeated an argument that the covenant was held on trust for them.
  • Another case said poor drafting doomed a 6-month non-compete and the employer’s bid to force deletion of former clients from an ex-employee’s LinkedIn network.
  • Separately, the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 is now in force, requiring employers to provide a simple complaint mechanism for data subjects and handle complaints without undue delay.

Insights

Why did UK courts reject a probationary non-compete, a LinkedIn deletion demand, and an £8,000 training clawback?
After BlueCrest and the new data-complaints law, what must LLPs and employers rewrite in contracts and compliance processes now?
Are your non-competes, training clawbacks, and group-company covenants already unenforceable under the latest UK court rulings?