Updated
Updated · POLITICO · Jun 25
Leading the Future Pulls Back After $8 Million Anti-Bores Push Fails in New York
Updated
Updated · POLITICO · Jun 25

Leading the Future Pulls Back After $8 Million Anti-Bores Push Fails in New York

3 articles · Updated · POLITICO · Jun 25

Summary

  • Leading the Future is unlikely to mount another Bores-style negative ad blitz this year after spending $8 million against Alex Bores, whose loss in New York was followed by a muted response from the pro-AI PAC.
  • Bores still finished a close second, just 4 percentage points behind Micah Lasher, and the winner also supports AI regulation and a data-center moratorium, undercutting the PAC’s effort to warn off regulation-minded candidates.
  • The race became a costly proxy war inside the AI industry: Anthropic-linked groups spent about $12 million for Bores, while Michael Bloomberg added $10 million to boost Lasher in the five-way primary.
  • Regulation advocates say the outcome showed anti-industry messaging can attract money and attention, and they argue the backlash has made Leading the Future less willing to intervene aggressively in other 2026 contests.

Insights

His win was shaped by billionaire and AI funds. How will Lasher prove his policies serve citizens over powerful donors?
As AI becomes a major campaign donor, what new rules can safeguard elections from the tech industry's growing influence?
How would an AI Sovereign Wealth Fund, which Lasher supports, change the relationship between the government and the tech industry?