Apollo Debt Solutions Caps 5% of Withdrawals After 16.8% Redemption Requests

3 articles · Updated · Wealth Management · Jun 23

Apollo Debt Solutions limited second-quarter withdrawals to 5% of outstanding shares after investors sought to redeem 16.8%, up from 11.2% in the prior period.
The roughly $25 billion non-traded private credit fund said most requests came from offshore investors—12.5% of shares—while US investor requests slowed to 4.3%.
Apollo became the latest manager to gate redemptions for a second straight quarter as worries persist over private credit, especially software exposure and possible AI disruption.
Cliffwater and BlackRock also imposed 5% caps after facing about 17% and 13% redemption requests, reinforcing signs of broader stress across retail-focused BDCs.
Apollo shares fell about 3.1%, and peers including Ares, KKR, Blackstone and Blue Owl also declined, even though Apollo says its software exposure is 20% to 30% below peers.

Sources

Left67%

Center33%

Wealth Management25d ago

Apollo Debt Solutions Caps Withdrawals at 5% Amid High Redemption Requests

CNBC25d ago

Apollo Curbs Withdrawals from $26B Private Credit Fund After 17% Redemption Spike

Bloomberg24d ago

Apollo Caps $25 Billion Private Credit Fund Withdrawals After 16.8% Redemption Requests

4 Sources

With regulators probing opaque valuations, are investors' billions truly safe in the booming private credit market?

As AI fears devalue software debt, what is the next hidden risk lurking in private credit portfolios?

Are redemption gates a 'feature' protecting investors or a 'bug' trapping their capital in a flawed model?

Private Credit’s Liquidity Crunch: Apollo’s 16.8% Redemption Wave, Withdrawal Caps, and the 2026 Market Reset

Overview

In early 2026, the private credit market faced a major test as semi-liquid funds like Apollo Debt Solutions BDC, which had become popular with retail investors, were hit by a surge in redemption requests. These funds only allow quarterly withdrawals, but when investors feared that the true value of their shares was much lower than the reported Net Asset Value, they rushed to redeem at the higher stated price. This wave of withdrawals put pressure on the funds’ liquidity limits and exposed the risks of offering limited liquidity in markets that can quickly turn volatile, highlighting the challenges of balancing investor access with long-term investment strategies.

...